I understand the influence and importance of Rotten Tomatoes but why do articles always refer to what the critic score is? When I went to look at Bloodshot's rating it has a 78% from the audience.

I read the article 'Bloodshot Is Better Than Any MCU Film of the Past 5 Years' on CBR and it referred to the poor 31% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. A critic will be more consistent in their reviews, even if I dont personally share their tastes.īut also, yeah, using a RT score to 'prove' a films quality is an arbitrary thing and a dumb way to quantify a films value. I can disagree with critics but at at least find that their critiques are generally coming from a more informed place, as opposed to audiences who may give a bad review based solely on weather or not its an MCU film or if the theatre they saw it in had a sticky floor. Why doesn't the audience score matter more since they are the one's buying tickets? I personally pay more attention to the audience score rather than critics.I personally tend to look at critic reviews over audiences, just cause audience views can come from such a massive range of proficiency in critical thinking.

Download bloodshot rotten tomatoes